Words: CJK characters count individually; other languages use browser word segmentation. Character counts use UTF-16 length (some emoji count as 2).
Instantly displays all statistics as you type. No button clicks needed.
Counts specified CJK characters and other word tokens separately; see the FAQ for rules and limits.
Automatically analyzes the top 10 most frequent keywords and their density.
Estimates reading time based on 500 chars/min for Chinese and 200 words/min for English.
All processing happens locally in your browser. No text is ever uploaded to any server.
Currently free to use; no registration required.
Use word counts for editorial briefs, layout limits and draft comparisons, with clear counting and reading-time assumptions.
Content MarketingPlan article length around the reader’s task, check examples and sources, and use word counts for editing rather than ranking quotas.
SEOUnderstand Flesch-Kincaid and other readability metrics. Learn how to improve your writing clarity and effectively communicate with your audience.
Writing TipsChinese has no spaces between words, making word counting fundamentally different from English. Explore the technical principles behind Chinese text segmentation.
TechnicalPaste text to view word counts, characters, sentences and paragraphs. Thai and accented Vietnamese words use browser word segmentation; counts can vary with the browser’s language rules.
The tool applies its reading-speed assumption to the supported word count. It is an estimate; individual reading speed and text difficulty can change the actual time.
The character fields count JavaScript UTF-16 code units (String.length), not visible graphemes. For example, A😀 counts as 3; e plus a combining accent (é) counts as 2, while precomposed é counts as 1. “Without spaces” removes whitespace matched by \s before counting. A publishing platform may use different rules.
No. CJK-heavy text uses a custom sentence-length, paragraph, and Chinese-diction heuristic; other text attempts an English syllable estimate for Flesch metrics. These are editing clues, not validated measures of comprehension, factual accuracy, or search ranking. They are not reliable proficiency ratings for Japanese, Korean, or other languages.